Rose Makeup

The brush 179 is a kabuki brush angle and how all of the precious seeds has two sections, one with natural bristles and synthetic bristles. The bristles are very soft and very good indeed, perhaps more than 182, the classic Kabuki permanent MAC is very useful for applying powder foundation or powder, quickly, as it covers an area considerably, more than 182. I would recommend it also for mineral products, some mua recommend it also for an application of soft and fuzzy bronzer.

The 128 brush has soft bristles and compact, has a part synthetic, suitable to apply liquid or cream products (given its size I would recommend it for a cream blusher, illuminating cream, cream color base and especially for liquid or cream foundation ), and a part of natural bristles, is best for powder products (blush, lighting, MSF ..). Then of course everyone can use to experiment further and use it in a different way).
As you can see from the photos I have no brushes that can be “considered” dupe, and even comparing it with those in the store that I have not found similar alternatives (maybe the 109 in size, but the 128 is flat, the 109 does not, so give effect still different).
To compare the size, you can see (from top to bottom) the brush blush essence, the 128, 129, 131 (“enough” similar, both dishes, but the 131 has longer bristles) and the 131.

Instead, taken from above, the 129 and 128.

The brush is a brush 234 eyes, particularly suitable for the gradient. also has a section of natural bristles, suitable for application of powder eye shadows, and a piece of synthetic bristles, suitable for hand application of eye shadow and cream products (or mousse, or texture as those of Eyes To Kill Armani or eye shadows of Kiko’s Kaleidoscopic), and used “peak”, then the sections involving entambe, blurs the products applied.
I also thought of using it in this way: with the synthetic apply the correction fluid on the eye and then simply turning the brush, dabbed with the natural part of it a little face powder transparent to fix it (like Mac Prep + Prime or Make Up Forever HD, but also Powderfladge Benefit!), what do you think?: D
In comparison photos (from the top down: 222, 234, 217) you can see that the 234 is very close to 217, both for the length of the bristles, and the fact of being flat (the 234 is still the flattest 217, the 222 has a round base instead).
In the frame from above we see the 234 and 217.
The brush is a brush 235 eyes, suitable for application of eye shadow, powder or cream that, over the entire eyelid and eyebrow arch, is easily comparable with the 227, but is larger and thicker.
In the pic, you can see the comparison (from left to right) between the 214, the 239, the 235 and finally 252.
In the frame from the 235 and 239.

For me the 235 is like a fusion between the 227 (which gives the size), the 239 (which it is being flat) and 214 (which gives the bristles short enough).

We pass to the lipstick;)

Both are Lustre and so both are not too opaque (Lush Amber, in particular is quite sheer, how they want the latest trends in summer and see the Rouge Dior Addict Shine by Coco Chanel) and do not dry the lips.

Lush Amber is a nude-beige, sheer, which leaves the lips a very natural, giving a touch of COLR naked and a fine light, shine on some (few and small)
(See photo for comparison, from right to left, Marquise D ‘[Wonder Woman], the dD’Nude Creams, Shy Girl and Lush Amber, which came out a little because it is less affected by the orange light).

Gem Of Roses is very special: a strawberry in the pipe is a little turned off by a purple undertone, but once applied to blend with the color of the lips, giving a good result strawberry very portable, no glitter or pearlescent.

In the picture comparison, and as you can see I do not have anything like this, (from right to left) Made to order [pret a papier], Fresh Salmon [spring forecast] and Gem Of Roses.

with respect to the rest of the collection:

- The eye shadow colors are very nice and should be assessed individually because some very beautiful and sn pigmented (as golden glaze, smoked ruby, dark indulgence ..) and some do sn pile of dust and glitter (even if it may please, but not to me I love matte colors);

- The MSF (provided that no lover of this product) are nice to look at, but a little too glittery, again depends on what you want! I personally regret the illuminating example of Cham Wheel (out in January) who did not have glitter and gave a gentle light;

- The blush have a texture that I like much, but I have taken nn nn because I found a color I liked the full, was the only warmth of coral, but it is very similar all’Utterly Game I, however, if one of color you like, I recommend it, the dust is fine and smooth, very nice!;

- No transparencies I liked, no color me impressed

In collaboration with Paola! (THANKS!)